Now that is a rather long web address from the Government of Canada. If you click it and read the page there, you will see that the only Oath of anything allowed in the confederation of Nations called Canada is the following: I, ……………….., do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors. So help me God.
Yet, in Alberta, the following illegal and possibly treasonous Oath(s) is used and has been used since 1955! as http://www.canlii.org/ab/laws/sta/o-1/20080616/whole.html points out. here is the first lawbreaker oath, the have 3 illegal oaths there in Alberta.
Oath of allegiance
1(1) When by a statute of Alberta a person is required to take an oath of allegiance it shall be taken in the following form:
I, , swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, her heirs and successors, according to law.
So help me God. The word DO is left out, it may as well read, I bookcase, or I, . . . . . , telivision. . And then the illegal wording ” according to law” was somehow mysteriously added in to that law busting non-sentance, it’s righty after that illegally added extra comma.
The bastardizing of the Canadian language in this false Oath, by the Alberta Government is far worse than I could ever do, for The Alberta Government in doing os has thrown into question every decision of every justice in Alberta since 1955, when that false Oath was put in.
the BNA act of 18hundred whatever year, which clearly predates the illegal Oath of Alberta in 1955 clearly stipulates the Oath shall be as the Canada government has written on the law books on how it should be worded.
The rumormongering mill has it htat the appeal court of Alberta has been shown how they have all taken illegal Oaths and are breaking the law, by trying to be something they clearly are not (Judges.)
It looks as if all the courts of Alberta are in dishoner, illegal, and filled with justices that know not the offical oath of office of Canada, and the meaning of that Oath. two preconditions to being a justice in Canada.
If the judge does not know the official oath of office, which they have to take to be a judge, nor the meaning of that official oath of office of the naiton of canada, then they are not a judge. . . .
The implications are just astounding, a texan who did not take the official Oath of office in texas to be a judge was found to have broken the law, and every ruling of his was thrown out. . . .
every court ruling since 1955 in Alberta looks to be illegal. . . . because since 1955 all the judges in Alberta have taken illegal and unlawful Oaths . . . . . . .